When Leaders Think They Have a People Problem (But the Data Says Otherwise)
- Deabadh Leadership Development
- 3 days ago
- 5 min read
Updated: 1 day ago
AT A GLANCE: Most organizations don’t fail because of talent — they fail because of friction. The IMF’s latest data shows that 75% of Europe’s performance gap with the U.S. is structural, not skills-based — a pattern CEOs see every day inside their own companies.
This article explains how structural incoherence quietly erodes performance, why leaders repeatedly misdiagnose friction as “people issues,” and why Europe’s human-centric architecture may become a strategic advantage as AI reshapes leadership.
Most organizations don’t have a talent problem — they have a friction problem.
The IMF’s latest data makes this explicit: three-quarters of Europe’s performance gap with the U.S. is structural, not skills-based. Structural drag shows up in GDP long before leaders feel it in their teams — but the pattern is always the same.
The real story:
People don’t fail in high-friction systems. Systems fail people.
And you can see this inside companies long before it shows up in macroeconomic data.
🚧 What the IMF Sees - and CEOs feel every Day
1. Teams don’t look slow because they’re slow.
They look slow because the structure absorbs their energy.
Just as Europe’s hubs create “pseudo-density,” many organizations mirror the same pattern:
lots of activity
minimal compounding benefit
2. Cross-border leadership doesn’t fail because of the leader.
It fails because the system resists movement.
Why cross border leadership stalls:
decision rights differ
expectations differ
authority structures differ
risk norms differ
Mobility friction is real in Europe — and most companies inadvertently recreate it internally.
3. Innovation rarely stalls because founders run out of ideas.
It stalls because capital, talent, and ideas can’t flow.
The block is structural, not creative.
A Crucial Clarification (So We Don’t Drift Into Binary Thinking)
This isn’t a free pass for poor leadership or toxic behavior.
Human dynamics — trust, communication, clarity, leadership style — absolutely matter.
But here’s the pattern we see across industries:
Human issues often sit on top of structural friction.
Fix the architecture, and suddenly behavior improves — not because people changed, but because the system stopped working against them.
Leaders often treat behavior as the root cause when it’s actually a downstream effect.
📚 The Multi-Disciplinary Verdict
It isn’t just the IMF.
Across disciplines, the conclusion is the same:
OECD: productivity gaps are structural, not capability-based.
WEF: skills exist but are systematically under-utilized.
Psychology (Berger, Edmondson, Snowden): behavior follows system constraints, not intention.
Multiple lenses, single story: structure determines outcomes.
The implications for leadership, team performance, and executive hiring are enormous.
What We’re Really Talking About When We Talk About Structure
“Structure” isn’t org charts or reporting lines — it’s the lived architecture of work:
how decisions actually get made
where accountability sits (and where it silently leaks)
how incentives signal priority
which roles carry disproportionate weight
how information moves through the system
what slows down when teams try to collaborate across borders or functions
This is the structure leaders experience, not the one they think they have.
When this architecture is misaligned, even exceptional people start to look like they’re underperforming.
📉 How Friction Compounds
Friction shows up as:
rework
stalled decisions
“personality clashes”
project drift
underperformance cycles
leadership fatigue
fragmented narratives
Underneath is a single root cause: structural incoherence.
📈 The 20% Lesson: Remove Friction → Release Capacity
The IMF estimates Europe could unlock 20.2% productivity simply by reducing structural, mobility, and investment friction.
Inside organizations, the same rule applies.
When friction drops:
bandwidth returns
clarity stabilizes
decision velocity increases
psychological safety rises
innovation recovers
execution stops feeling uphill
This is what CEOs feel when “suddenly the same people perform differently.”
Nothing changed in the people.
The system unlocked.
🧠 What CEOs Ask When the Systems Strain
My team is strong. Why are we still slow?
Because capability can’t outrun drag.
Why is cross-border work always more fragile?
Because mobility friction is structural long before it’s behavioral.
We hire strong leaders. Why do they get stuck?
Because leaders fail at the joining conditions — the invisible system dynamics they inherit on day one.
Our strategy is clear. Why can’t we execute it?
Because clarity on paper isn’t clarity in the system.
Why doesn’t leadership development stick?
Because the system contradicts the behaviors you’re trying to build.
Who thrives in complex, constrained environments?
Leaders with systems literacy:
pattern recognition
cross-border fluency
coherence design
psychological steadiness
structural clarity
intelligent pacing
friction management
These leaders don’t just handle complexity.
They stabilize it.
🌍 Why Europe Needs a Different Kind of Leader
Most leadership models were built for environments Europe does not resemble:
U.S. → velocity, scale, capital abundance
Asia → density, cohesion, synchronized systems
Europe → fragmentation, multi-jurisdiction complexity, friction
Europe therefore requires coherence-makers — leaders who succeed because the environment is complex.
Most U.S.-style playbooks underperform in Europe for one reason: they assume frictionless systems.
Europe is a friction system.
Europe’s Hidden AI Advantage
For decades, Europe’s human-centric systems — worker protections, dignity norms, privacy rules — were seen as drag.
But in the AI era, those same constraints may become strategic advantages.
AI amplifies existing system properties - it does not overwrite them.
AI increases the need for:
ethical judgment
psychological safety
humane pacing
trust systems
relational intelligence
coherent decision patterns
The U.S. model optimizes for speed.
Europe optimizes for stability.
As AI scales, stability may outperform velocity.
AI doesn’t diminish the need for human leadership.
It amplifies it.
🏛 Implications for Senior Hiring
Before we go further, let’s name the obvious:
Yes — as an advisory firm, we see structure everywhere.
But this isn’t about selling structure.
It’s about preventing leaders from burning through great people because the system was misaligned.
Most executive failures don’t come from selecting “the wrong person.”
They come from placing the right person into:
misaligned systems
unclear mandates
unacknowledged tensions
contradictory expectations
incoherent structures
If the system is misdiagnosed, the brief is mis-specified. If the brief is mis-specified, the hire is mispositioned before they even arrive.
Senior appointments require someone who can read:
the system
the joining conditions
the structural constraints
the hidden tensions
The IMF diagnoses the macro version.
CEOs feel the micro version every day.
🎯 Final Thought
Europe’s growth — and your organization’s performance — is not determined by talent. It is determined by conditions.
People do not fail in high-friction systems.
Systems fail people.
Fix the structure,
and capability becomes visible almost overnight.
✒️ About the Author
Suzanne Taylor Warren is a Partner and Group HRD at Deabadh, advising CEOs, Boards, and Family Enterprises on senior leadership performance, structural friction and cross-border executive hiring.
Her work sits at the intersection of strategy, psychology, economics, and organizational design — helping leaders diagnose the conditions that determine whether talent thrives or stalls.
With two decades of experience across Europe, the U.S., and the Middle East, she specializes in high-stakes senior appointments, governance for family offices, and leadership performance in complex, multi-jurisdiction environments.
🟦 About Deabadh
Founded in 2004, Deabadh is a boutique executive search and leadership advisory firm working at the intersection of talent, psychology, and system design. We help CEOs, Boards, and Family Enterprises build the structural and relational conditions for high performance — from senior hiring to succession, leadership development, and organizational coherence.
Our proprietary frameworks — Perceptual Search™, Leadership Elasticity™, and the Deabadh Operating System — integrate 20 years of cross-sector research with deep practical insight into how leaders truly perform in complex, high-friction environments.
Learn more at deabadhgroup.com
Comments